In the previous section, you explored methods that detect exoplanets indirectly, by observing how planets influence the light or motion of their stars. In this section, you’ll reach the next frontier: detecting exoplanets more directly — either by capturing their light or by watching their stars shift position on the sky.
These methods are technically demanding because stars outshine their planets by enormous factors. A Jupiter-like planet reflects billions of times less light than its star, while an Earth-like planet can be fainter by a factor of ten billion. Direct detection therefore requires extremely precise instruments and careful filtering of starlight.
Direct Imaging
The most intuitive way to find a planet is simply to see it. The direct imaging method does exactly this, but in practice it is one of the most difficult techniques in astronomy.
To reveal a planet, astronomers must first suppress the overwhelming glare of the star. This is done using a device called a coronagraph, which blocks the star’s light while allowing faint surrounding objects — such as planets — to become visible. The process is similar to observing the solar corona during a total solar eclipse, when the Sun’s surface is hidden by the Moon.
Direct imaging works best for planets that are:
- far from their parent stars,
- massive, and
- still warm from their formation (so they glow in the infrared).
Because of this, the first directly imaged planets were young gas giants orbiting far from their stars. One of the best-known examples is the HR 8799 system, in which four giant planets have been imaged directly orbiting the same star. Another famous example is Beta Pictoris b, a planet that has been tracked as it orbits its star over time.
Modern observatories push direct imaging even further. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is capable of detecting infrared light from planets and analyzing the composition of their atmospheres. JWST has already measured molecules such as water vapour, carbon dioxide, and methane in exoplanet atmospheres — marking the transition from discovering planets to studying them as physical worlds.
Future projects such as the European Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) and proposed missions like HabEx and LUVOIR aim to bring direct imaging to the point where Earth-like planets around nearby stars could be observed directly for the first time.
Astrometry
The second direct technique does not capture light from the planet itself, but instead measures how a star shifts position on the sky. This method is known as astrometry.
As a planet orbits, the star also moves — not just toward and away from us (as in radial velocity), but sideways as well. When measured precisely enough, the star traces a tiny circle or arc against the background of more distant stars.
Astrometry is exceptionally challenging because even large planets cause extremely small motions in their stars. For nearby stars, these displacements can be smaller than a millionth of a degree on the sky.
This method is now coming into its own thanks to the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission. Gaia is measuring the positions of over a billion stars with unprecedented precision. As its data accumulate, Gaia is detecting the subtle motions caused by orbiting planets — especially massive planets orbiting at large distances from their stars.
Astrometry provides one crucial advantage: it measures the true mass of a planet, not just a minimum mass as with radial velocity. This allows astronomers to refine planetary population statistics and distinguish between planets and low-mass stars or brown dwarfs.
Why Direct Methods Matter
Indirect methods tell us that planets exist and give us their basic properties. Direct methods tell us what planets are like.
Direct imaging and astrometry allow astronomers to:
- study planetary atmospheres and weather,
- measure temperatures and cloud structures,
- detect chemical signatures such as water vapour or methane,
- map orbital motion in three dimensions, and
- reconstruct the architecture of planetary systems.
Taken together with radial velocity, transits, and microlensing, direct methods complete the transition from discovery to planetary science. Exoplanets are no longer just dots on plots — they are now physical objects with clouds, winds, chemistry, and climate.
Learning Activity: Geometry and Detection
How a planet is detected depends strongly on geometry.
Consider the following cases:
- A planet whose orbit is edge-on to Earth
- A planet whose orbit is face-on to Earth
- A planet far from its star
- A hot planet orbiting very close to its star
For each case:
- Which detection methods would work well?
- Which methods would fail or be difficult?
- What type of telescope (optical, infrared, space-based, ground-based) would be best suited?
Summarize your answers in a short table or bullet list. Pay special attention to how orbital alignment and distance affect what we can and cannot observe.
In the next section, you’ll go beyond detection altogether and explore how astronomers are now probing exoplanet atmospheres, mapping temperatures, and searching for chemical fingerprints that may one day reveal signs of life.
